TL;DR
Get business pricing on garage and car supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
A road.cc review found the Nutrak TPU tube weighed 56.8g and offered a metal Presta valve with a thicker construction. It had no problems during testing, but was heavier and bulkier than other TPU tubes tested, and the reviewer questioned whether its durability trade-off justified the price.
Road.cc’s 2026 review of the Nutrak TPU tube with a copper Presta valve found a design that trades some of TPU’s weight and packing advantages for a thicker tube and metal valve. The reviewer recorded a weight of 56.8g and reported no punctures or other problems during testing, but said that short-term experience was not enough to establish long-term durability.
In the review, the Nutrak tube weighed 56.8g, compared with 138.4g for the reviewer’s standard butyl tube. That makes it substantially lighter than the tested butyl option. Against TPU alternatives, however, the Nutrak was heavier: a standard-size tube in the comparison weighed 27.8g, while a gravel tube designed for 40–50mm tyres weighed 48.9g.
The reviewer also found the Nutrak took up more space when packed than other TPU tubes tested, estimating that two standard TPU tubes could fit into roughly the space occupied by one Nutrak. These comparisons reflect the products in this review, rather than a survey of every tube on the market.
The tube’s construction and valve are central to its design. The review describes the TPU as thicker than lightweight alternatives and the copper-coloured valve as metal. The manufacturer’s product claims include reduced rolling weight, improved valve strength and corrosion resistance, and high air retention. Those are manufacturer claims; the supplied review does not report independent testing of corrosion resistance or air retention.
The Durability Trade-Off
TPU tubes are often chosen because they are light and compact compared with traditional butyl tubes. Nutrak’s design targets riders who would prefer a more substantial tube and a metal valve, particularly when using a pump whose connection may be less suitable for a plastic valve stem. The reviewer said the Nutrak valve felt more robust than plastic valves on other lightweight TPU tubes they had used.
That added construction comes with a clear compromise: the Nutrak was heavier and bulkier than the TPU examples in the test. For riders prioritising the smallest possible emergency spare or minimum weight, those differences may matter more than the more substantial feel. The review’s verdict was that the tube worked as intended but did not offer enough advantage to justify the weight and size penalty for that reviewer.
The review gave the tube 8/10 for quality and performance, but 5/10 overall and 5/10 for value. It also said the reviewer would not buy it and would probably not recommend it. Those scores reflect one reviewer’s assessment, not a controlled durability comparison or a consensus among riders.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How Nutrak Compares
The review frames the Nutrak as a middle-ground option between standard butyl tubes and lighter TPU models. Its 56.8g test weight was 81.6g below the reviewer’s 138.4g butyl tube, while two TPU comparison tubes weighed 27.8g and 48.9g. The measurements show the Nutrak retained a weight saving over that butyl tube, but did not match the lighter TPU examples.
Price also shaped the reviewer’s assessment. Road.cc reported that some retailers offered two standard TPU tubes for around £11, and cited a recently tested PSIKIC tube priced at £15.99. The report said Tubolito products, despite higher recommended retail prices, were widely available for less. It described Nutrak’s price as fairly typical, but the supplied material does not state the tube’s exact price or provide a like-for-like price table for each compared product.
The review disclosed that its page contains retailer links that may earn road.cc a commission if readers make purchases. It also stated that its reviews are independent. The article’s assessment is based on the reviewer’s use and comparisons; the available source does not provide a long-term test period or laboratory results.
“I had no punctures or problems with the Nutrak tubes during testing, although that’s obviously not enough to make any definitive claims about long-term durability.”
— Road.cc reviewer
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Durability Evidence Still Limited
The review does not establish whether the thicker TPU will last longer or resist punctures better than lighter TPU tubes. The reviewer experienced no punctures during testing, but gave no test duration, mileage or controlled comparison that would support a definitive durability conclusion. The manufacturer’s claims about air retention and corrosion resistance are also not backed by test results in the material provided.
The exact retail price at the time of publication is not included in the supplied report, limiting direct value comparisons. It is also unclear how the tube performs across different tyre sizes, pressures, riding conditions or pump designs. The reviewer’s findings should be read as an individual product assessment, not a guarantee of performance for all riders.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Long-Term Testing Needed
The next useful evidence would be longer-term riding tests that record mileage, punctures, air loss and valve condition, alongside comparable lightweight TPU tubes. That could show whether the thicker construction provides a durability benefit large enough to offset its extra weight and packed size.
Readers considering the tube can compare its current price and dimensions with the specific alternatives they would carry, and check that their pump works with its Presta valve. Road.cc’s supplied report does not announce further testing or a product change, so whether additional durability results will be published is not yet clear.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
How much does the Nutrak TPU tube weigh?
The road.cc reviewer recorded a weight of 56.8g. The product information in the supplied report lists it at approximately 56g.
Is it lighter than a butyl tube?
Yes, compared with the reviewer’s 138.4g butyl tube, the Nutrak weighed 56.8g. The review does not establish how it compares with every butyl tube.
Is the Nutrak lighter than other TPU tubes?
Not the examples in the review. A standard-size TPU tube weighed 27.8g, and a gravel TPU tube for 40–50mm tyres weighed 48.9g. The Nutrak also took up more packed space, according to the reviewer.
Did the review prove that the tube is more durable?
No. The reviewer reported no punctures or problems during testing but said that was not enough to establish long-term durability. The supplied material gives no controlled or extended comparison.
What was the reviewer’s overall verdict?
The reviewer said the tube worked, but rated it 5/10 overall, citing its weight and size relative to other TPU tubes. The review gave it 8/10 for quality and performance and 5/10 for value.
Source: rss
Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day Picks
long weekend sales
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
